top of page
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

AimPoint Putting: The Science, the Skeptics, and the Secret Weapon for Your Short Game

Updated: May 28




If you've ever seen a golfer on TV standing like they're trying to catch Wi-Fi with their fingers in the air, you've witnessed AimPoint putting in action. This modern green-reading technique has stirred both admiration and controversy in the golf world. Let's delve into what AimPoint is, its origins, pros and cons, and whether it's more effective than traditional methods.


What Is AimPoint Putting?

AimPoint is a green-reading system that combines feel and physics to determine the correct line for a putt. Developed by Mark Sweeney in the early 2000s, the method involves:GolfDigest.comGolfDigest.com+4Gears Sports+4WSJ+4


  1. Feeling the Slope: Standing on the line of the putt to sense the slope with your feet.

  2. Estimating the Slope Percentage: Determining the degree of the slope (e.g., 1%, 2%).

  3. Using Finger Placement: Holding up fingers corresponding to the slope percentage to find the aim point.GolfWRX Forums+7GolfDigest.com+7The Left Rough+7

This technique translates the slope into a precise target line, aiming to improve putting accuracy.GolfDigest.com+6WSJ+6Gears Sports+6


The Origins of AimPoint

Mark Sweeney, a software developer and avid golfer, created AimPoint after noticing inconsistencies in green-reading during televised golf events. He developed a system that used physics and slope data to predict putt breaks, which was initially used by broadcasters. The method gained popularity among professional golfers for its analytical approach to putting.WSJGolfDigest.com+1The Left Rough+1


Pros of AimPoint

❌ Cons of AimPoint

  • Learning Curve: Requires practice and possibly instruction to master.

  • Perceived Slow Play: Critics argue it can slow down the game, especially when used excessively. 

  • Aesthetic Criticism: Some find the finger-holding technique visually unappealing or distracting.

  • Not Foolproof: Relies on accurate slope estimation; errors can lead to missed putts.Worldwide Golf+2Reddit+2The Left Rough+2WSJ+1The Irish Sun+1Gears Sports


AimPoint vs. Traditional Green Reading

Traditional green reading relies on visual cues and experience to judge the slope and break of a putt. AimPoint introduces a more analytical method, potentially offering greater precision. However, its effectiveness depends on the golfer's ability to accurately feel and interpret slope percentages. While some players see significant improvement, others may find traditional methods more intuitive.GolfDigest.com+1The Left Rough+1


The Controversy Surrounding AimPoint

AimPoint has sparked debate in the golf community. Critics like Lucas Glover have called for its ban, citing concerns over slow play and etiquette.  Conversely, supporters argue that when used correctly, AimPoint can speed up play and improve performance.  The controversy highlights the balance between innovation and tradition in golf.YouTube+2The Irish Sun+2Golf+2Golf Monthly


Should You Try AimPoint?

If you're seeking a structured, analytical approach to green reading and are willing to invest time in learning the technique, AimPoint could be a valuable tool. However, it's essential to consider your personal preferences and whether the method aligns with your playing style.


Learn More

For a deeper dive into AimPoint, check out this interview with its creator, Mark Sweeney: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBr5erE9gQM


At South Bay Golf Club, we embrace innovative techniques like AimPoint to help golfers of all levels improve their game. Whether you're a traditionalist or a tech-savvy player, our facilities and instruction cater to your needs.

 
 
bottom of page